RECALL
TIME IN ALABAMA
Federation of States - August 25, 2003--Should the Federal government be allowed to designate approved Ministers who may be allowed to claim Freedom of Religion? Would the next step be for the Federal Government to designate approved Religions or Churches who would be allowed Freedom of Religion? Would the next step be for the Federal Government to define what is and what is not “religion”?
Guess what? They have already done all of this. A notable recent outrage was a Federal Court declaring the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional because of the phrase inserted by President Eisenhower, “under God”. The next, and even more horrendous and outrageous Federal Court error was the ruling by U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson that the display of the stone monument of the Ten Commandments in the rotunda of the Alabama Supreme Court building was unconstitutional and the monument of the Ten Commandments had to be removed. An additional outrage of the Federal Court system is from U. S. District Judge Jones in Southern California ruling that the Boy Scouts of America is a religious organization.
Would you not think that Anti-Religionists are a Religion fighting religion, or anyone’s interpretation of religion or practice of religion or references to God including prayer in public (government places)? We notice that the Anti-Religionists, however, never complain against the religion of Science, especially not against the religion of Darwinist Evolution. The people in religious organizations can play this religious designation game too, but with supposed impunity, since the government (Courts) are Constitutionally constrained from that realm of religious arguments. The public, as a whole, theoretically has the final say in recall elections and in constitutional amendments.
Many, including the Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, are adamantly stating:
“Enough is enough”
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE REVISITED
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America:
Our Congress, July 4, 1776, signed the unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America which began:
When in the course of human events it becomes
necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected
them with another , and to assume among the Powers of the earth, the separate
and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God
entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they
should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these
truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any
Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the
People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying
its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to
them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
The Constitution of the United States was an amendment to the Articles of Confederation , that were amended by the Congress of the Confederacy of the United States of America on September 17, 1787, with the historic signing of the amendments called the Constitution of the United States. Their signatures are found at the end of ARTICLE VII stating:
DONE in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven . . .
Even prior to those events, in 1774, look at what was voted for and happened in Congress:
A Constant Reminder That
America Was Born With a Prayer and Founded as a Nation "UNDER GOD".
September 7, 1774.
Carpenter’s Hall - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania -- When
the Congress first met, Mr. Cushing (also representing Massachusetts) made a
Motion, that it should be opened with prayer.”
“Mr. Peyton Randolph, our
President, requested the prayer for the following morning from an Episcopal
clergyman, Mr. Duche, . . .”
THE PRAYER
Lord, our Heavenly Father,
High and Mighty King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, who dost from thy throne
behold all the dwellers on earth; and reignest with power supreme and
uncontrolled over all the Kingdoms, Empires and Governments; look down in mercy
we beseech Thee, on these American States, who have fled to Thee from the rod
of the oppressor, and thrown themselves on Thy gracious protection, desiring
henceforth to be dependent only on Thee; to Thee, they have appealed for the
righteousness of their cause; to Thee do they now look up for that countenance
and support which Thou alone canst give; take them therefore Heavenly Father,
under Thy nurturing care; give them wisdom in Council and valor in the field;
defeat the malicious designs of our cruel adversaries; convince them of the
unrighteousness of their cause; and if they persist in their sanguinary
purpose, O, let the voice of Thy own unerring justice, sounding in their
hearts, constrain them to drop the weapons of war from their unnerved hands in
the day of battle!
Be Thou present, O God
of wisdom, and direct the councils of this honorable assembly; enable them to
settle things on the best and surest foundation, that the scene of blood may be
speedily closed; that order, harmony and peace may be effectually restored, and
truth and justice, religion and piety prevail and flourish among Thy
people.
Preserve the health of
their bodies and vigor of their minds; shower down on them and the millions
they here represent, such temporal blessings as Thou seest expedient for them
in this world, and crown them with everlasting glory in the world to come.
All this
we ask in the name and through the merits of Jesus Christ, Thy Son, Our
Savior. Amen. [The
above proceedings and prayer were recorded in a letter from John Adams to his
wife.]
Don’t these conspirators in the ACLU,
Southern Poverty Law Center and America United for Separation of Church and
State and the Federal agents such as U. S. Attorneys and Federal District
Judges know anything? Don’t they know
that the front facade of the United States Supreme Court building has a picture
of Moses carved in stone holding the tablets containing the Ten Commandments
and that each door of entry around the Supreme Court building is made of heavy
oak with the Ten Commandments carved into the face of the doors. Must all of this be removed because it is
furthering a religion? What idiots are
those proposing this insanity, or are they traitors against the
Constitution? There comes a time when
men must stand their ground and women must stand it with them.
Clearly, the Supreme Court, at least, knows
what other nations, long before the United States, knew which is that the Ten
Commandments and the Statutes and Judgment based upon the civil and criminal rights
and prohibitions founded thereon formed the basis for civil and criminal law
for the nations of Europe, much of Asia and large parts of Africa for thousands
of years. Now, certain highly confused
and brainwashed black robed judges don’t know that the basis for our law is the
Ten Commandments. Can you imagine that
we have such people dictating our lives and property over us who are too stupid
to see the difference? Surely, these
idiots must be removed from the bench and from prosecutorial positions and, We
the People can surely accomplish this.
How dare a black robed United States District
Judge order the Ten Commandments removed
from a State Supreme Court building, claiming separation
of Church and State as the excuse. How
dare U. S. District Judge Myron Thompson attempt to order the Supreme Court of
Alabama, an independent State, to obey Federal Court orders where the Federal
Court has no Jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia.
This order by the Federal District Court, by
Judge Myron Thompson, should be the final belligerent straw for the existence
of the present tyrannical Federal District Court system. The real issue here is FEDERAL ABUSE OF
POWER vs
STATES RIGHTS. However,
the issue of the Freedom of Religion
and not from Religion is a secondary issue, which
is in the headlights of the press and public scrutiny.
Addressing the issue that is before the
public today of the removal of the monument of the Ten Commandments, it is
clear that the atheists and other anti-founding father’s groups who have banned
together into three main groups, namely the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Southern Poverty
Law Center and the Americans United for Separation of Church and State and have
filed various lawsuits and have deliberately perverted the meaning, as well as
the founding father’s intent, in the First Amendment to meanings never
intended.
The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States provides that:
Congress shall
make no law
respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
1. In 1787, at the time of the signing of
the Constitution, the States were sovereign and independent States working
together under a successful Confederation, under which they had won their
independence from the King of England.
The idea of being ruled by a super state, such as Washington, D.C., was
a feared and repugnant consideration among most of these founders who greatly
distrusted Kings and centralized Federal power.
The creation of a “nationalist super state” was not the intent of the
vast majority of those founding fathers.
2. Thomas Jefferson, who penned the
Declaration of Independence and had much influence upon James Madison’s writing
of the Bill of Rights which was passed by Congress as part of the Constitution
and ratified by the States, made it clear that the First Amendment was no
prohibition against religion, but an
estoppel against government from interfering with religion or Churches. Jefferson considered this a one way door
allowing independence for and free exercise of religion, but stopping
government interference. However,
Jefferson also provided that Congress would not pass any law respecting an
establishment of religion.
In a call to action, Jefferson exclaims
that unless the people put off the shackles which bind them and abolish any
laws inhibiting religious freedom, the state of religious freedom in this
country will only decline until "our rights shall revive or expire in a
convulsion." Jefferson's Notes on Virginia, Query XVII,
1782
It is
of great interest to note that in the ensuing years since this Amendment was
ratified that in the wording of the First Amendment, the third of the first twelve Amendment
proposals, that in the true bill submitted to the states for ratification "Congress
shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, . . . " , not " . . .
an establishment of religion, . . . " The word "THE" is definitely more "declaratory and restrictive" than "AN". This fraudulent deception has allowed
misconstruction of a very explicit
restriction on the legislatures and the government. This changed wording
appears in virtually all presentations of the 1st Amendment today,
including the official NARA presentation. It was correctly presented in history books
prior to the Civil War. The correct wording as presented to the States for
ratification is shown in the original "True Bill". There are
also records of the several States in their discussion of the first twelve Amendment
proposals. For example:
In New Hampshire’s Ratification Document
with their Amendment Recommendations, they list as one of the recommendations: “CONGRESS
shall make no laws touching Religion or to infringe the rights of Conscience.”
3. The
founding fathers were overwhelmingly of Christian culture and heritage as was
the American public. Even today we are predominantly Christian nation and not a
nation expressing a religious predominant religious heritage of Moslem, Jewish,
Hindu, Buddhist, Confuscianist, Shintoist, Agnostic, Humanist, Atheistic,
Satanic nor any other heritage other
than predominantly Christian heritage and social culture. Of course, small segments of these lesser
religions do exist in the United States and with Constitutional protections as
well. This is not to name a Church or
denomination per se, but a culture of the people who founded this nation and
who fought for its independence and who framed the Constitution thereof. In the 1892 Supreme Court decision of Holy
Trinity vs. The United States, the court in its majority opinion cited
88 historical reasons why the United States was a Christian nation. (It should
be noted that the Christian and Jewish religions both recognize the Ten
Commandments also called the Decalog of Moses found in the Old Testament
(Pentateuch) or the Torah as being the foundation of civil law, the violation
of many of those statutes bringing civil or criminal penalties.
4. The
false and erroneous term “Separation of Church and State” is a corruption of
the actual First Amendment. None of the
words, “Church”, State” nor “Separation” exist in the amendment. By
fraudulently substituting the phrase “Separation of Church and State” for the
actual amendment, clever attorneys have been able to argue their cases and
trick juries and judges to establish case law precedence based upon a false and
fraudulent premise. Arguments using the phrase “Separation of Church and State”
which is erroneous and not part of the Constitution, nor amendments thereto, do
not establish subject matter jurisdiction for the federal Court in the present
Ten Commandments case against Judge Roy Moore, and the fraudulent
representation of this phrase as part of the First Amendment should be
actionable under Federal Criminal Statutes.
The actual amendment states: “Congress
shall make no law
[touching religion] respecting the establishment of religion,” [The
intent and meaning of this is that Congress shall pass no law creating a State
Religion . . . no law favoring establishment of some particular religion . . .
and no law involving (or touching) an existing religion or (religious symbols
or objects or statements). If Congress
is restricted, the Courts are restricted as well since they are not authorized
to write or pass laws. The President is
restricted because he is not authorized to pass laws but to enforce or carry
out laws passed by Congress.][New Hampshire’s recommended amendment read: “CONGRESS shall make
no laws touching Religion
or to infringe the rights of Conscience].”
“or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” [this means that Congress may not pass a
law restricting or prohibiting the free exercise of religion. . .thus neither
may the courts nor the executive branch (President) restrict or prohibit the
free exercise of religion.]
5. The
Ten Commandments are not a religion nor is a monument of the Ten Commandments a
religion or a religious object, but instead a set of Civil laws given for a
Constitution of a nation headed by Moses thousands of years ago. Upon the general constitution; Bill of Rights
and Prohibitions found in the Ten Commandments (also called the Decalog of
Moses) were founded Civil and Criminal Statutes and Judgments for the operation
of the Nation of Israel of old.
Religion, in those days, amounted to a series of sacrifices and
ordinances required of the people of that religion. The people living in Israel of old were
predominantly of the same religion, that being a religion of Abraham which was
also encouraged by Moses. To claim that
the Bill of Rights and Prohibitions (Ten Commandments) in those days was a
religion is like claiming that our modern day Bill of Rights is a
religion. In the Old Testament we find
a history of a people and a nation with their trials, tribulations, wars, etc. Is history a religion?
Death
sentences in those days were not issued for failure to go to the Synagogue
(Church) or to make certain sacrifices of doves or lambs to the Priests, but
rather for the violation of Criminal law statutes heralding from the Bill of
Rights and Prohibitions called the Ten commandments. Moses claimed those provisions were given to
him by God. The 1st Commandment alleges to be from God and
establishes His credentials. The 2nd
Commandment establishes God expects from His people Israel. Does that make the Ten Commandments a
religion? Most of our founding fathers
believed that wisdom was given by God to help them gain independence and form a
Constitution which started with the Declaration of Independence. God or the Lord is mentioned in both the
Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Does that make those documents a religion not to be allowed on government or
public property? Which department of
Government thinks they have the authority to define religion as to what is and
what is not?
We
should petition and demand a statement by the each head of our Departments of
Government President, namely: the Speaker of the House, the President of the
Senate and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court that they:
1. Do have authority to define religion.
2. That they do not have authority to define
religion.
Perhaps
we should demand answers from the various political candidates as to whether
they believe government has the right to define religion. Then we can know who is not suitable to
elect or re-elect.
A writ
of Mandamus should be brought against the U. S. Attorney in Alabama requiring
him to prosecute those guilty of the above crimes, namely the ACLU, the SPLC
and the AUSCS, especially for defrauding U.S. District Court Judge Myron
Thompson with false arguments causing him to commit crimes as well.
U.S.
District Judge Myron Thompson is the one who ordered the Ten Commandments
monument removed from the State Supreme Court building in Alabama. How dare him do such a thing. On at least three counts has he erred,
producing the irrevokable grounds for his removal from the bench.
1. Ridiculously erring and falling prey to the
lies and fraudulent arguments of the counsel of the Anti-American , Anti
Religion coalition against the foundation of our law and has thus
misinterpreted the First Amendment,
2. on the grounds that Judge Thompson’s order
violates U.S. Constitution, Art. 6., Sec. 3.- "no religious test shall
ever be required" and
3. on the grounds that the Federal Court has no
jurisdiction over the matter in a sovereign State where no interstate commerce
issues are involved.
U.S.
Constitution, AMENDMENT
X.
The powers not delegated to the United
States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to
the States respectively, or to the people.
Because
of his violation of the Civil Rights of Chief Justice Roy Moore of his freedom of
speech and belief, U. S. District Judge
Myron Thompson has lost his immunity and may be sued civilly for damages and
defamation. Judge Thompson could be in
violation of U.S.C. 18 Section 241 - Conspiracy against rights, a ten
year felony. Conspiring parties, namely
the American Civil Liberties Union, Southern Poverty Law Center and the
American United For Separation of Church and State, could be liable as well for
these civil and criminal Civil Rights violations.
Moreover, because Judge Thompson presumed to issue
Federal Court orders against the State Supreme Court of Alabama without
jurisdiction over the State of Alabama, his orders are unlawful, moot and void
and should not be obeyed by Chief Justice Roy Moore. The other eight associate justices of the
Alabama Supreme Court have seriously erred in cowardly jumping to obey the
illegal Federal order and should be immediately recalled by the people of
Alabama.
This
issue transcends party politics whether Republican or Democrat and must bring
all true Americans together to put an end to this outrage and tyranny of the
U.S. District Courts. Because these
Federal Courts have allowed a long train of abuses and usurpations, they have
invoked the next phrase of the Declaration of Independence which states:
But when a long train of abuses and
usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce
them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw
off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Recall eight confused judges
by Ron Anderson
It's time for Alabamians to start a recall campaign for
eight confused associate justices of their state Supreme Court. They are
committing treachery against the state of Alabama and against her Creator [in
their decision against the Ten Commandments].
Section 1 of the Alabama Constitution asserts that all men
"are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights;"
Section 3 declares that "no religion shall be
established by law; that no preference shall be given by law to any religious
sect ..." [The Ten Commandments are not a religious sect, but the civil
law of ancient Israel.
Acknowledging the Old Testament consensus of the identity
of that Creator and His requirements of all Alabamians is not the same as the
establishment of a state religious sect. It is essential to her survival (as a
Sovereign State), ensuring that said Creator does not rescind what He endowed -
the grafted vine, as He did to the natural branches in Jeremiah's era. (End of Anderson’s Internet Article)
-------------
But, it
shall not be enough to unseat Judge Thompson by a formal complaint to the
Judicial Conduct Commission and by prosecuting him for a felony nor to simply
recall a few black robed tyrants (Alabama Supreme Court Associate Justices) by
public outrage and petition, but it shall require a Constitutional Amendment
for the removal of United States District Court from all of our States, leaving
only the Circuit Courts of Appeal and allowing the various State Courts to
handle judicial affairs within their respective States in accordance with their
respective State laws.
Thomas
Jefferson later wrote to Mrs. John Adams: "I like
a little rebellion now and then.... The spirit of resistance to government is
so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive. It
will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be exercised at
all."
He wrote to W. S. Smith, "God forbid we
should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion." Thomas
Jefferson's Notes on
Virginia, Query XVII, 1782.
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their
country! Now is the time for sacrifice of time, effort and money to drive a
petition in Alabama to produce a recall election of all eight of these confused
and gutless judges of the Alabama Supreme Court while re-electing Chief Justice
Roy Moore regardless of the State Judicial Commission. The State Judicial Conduct Commission must
be restaffed as well.
*
* *